The VLE is Dead


13:40 - 15:00 on Tuesday, 8 September in 1.218


The VLE is Dead
1 symposium
286 The VLE is Dead
James Clay, Steve Wheeler, Graham Attwell


Review this session

Overall:
  • Rate this talk
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

3.67 (3 votes)
leave a written review

Death of the VLE Symposium at ALT-C 2009.

graveyard

Background

The future success of e-learning depends on appropriate selection of tools and services. This symposium will propose that the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) as an institutional tool is dead, no more, defunct, expired.

Ideas to be explored

The first panel member, Steve Wheeler, will argue that many VLEs are not fit for purpose, and masquerade as solutions for the management of online learning. Some are little more than glorified e-mail systems. They will argue that VLEs provide a negative experience for learners.

The second member of the panel, Graham Attwell, believes that the VLE is dead and that the Personal Learning Environment (PLE) is the solution to the needs of diverse learners. PLEs provide opportunities for learners, offering users the ability to develop their own spaces in which to reflect on their learning.

The third panel member, James Clay, however, believes that the VLE is not yet dead as a concept, but can be the starting point of a journey for many learners. Creating an online environment involving multiple tools that provides for an enhanced experience for learners can involve a VLE as a hub or centre.

The fourth panel member, Nick Sharratt, argues for the concept of the institutional VLE as essentially sound. VLEs provide a stable, reliable, self-contained and safe environment in which all teaching and learning activities can be conducted. It provides the best environment for the variety of learners within institutions.

The session will be chaired by Josie Fraser.

Structure of session

The symposium will begin with an opportunity for attendees to voice their opinions on the future of the VLE. Each member of the panel will then present their case. The panel, with contributions from the audience, will then debate the key issues that have arisen.

Intended outcomes

By the end of the debate, participants will be able to have a greater understanding of the evolution and possible extinction of the VLE and the impact on learners.

A summary of the key points of the discussion will be syndicated on several blogs and other online spaces, and delegates will be encouraged to tweet and live blog the discussion as it happens in real time.

Photo source.

10:17AM Tue Aug 25, 2009


See the Bus Advert.

Buy the T-Shirt (or the mug).

Watch the trailer.

At ALT-C you will be able to join the debate...

08:50PM Tue Sep 01, 2009


Notice about this Symposium.

Vlefuneralinvitation_medium
09:40AM Thu Sep 03, 2009


If the VLE is dead, what are we going to call "the ICT system that facilitates e-learning" - and how are we going to benchmark its adoption and monitor/enhance its quality?

10:56AM Sat Sep 05, 2009


Hi James, Paul and others,

I think the term to use is Cloud Learning Environment (CLE) as we find out that IT departments are going to, slowly, outsource more and more. @UoPortsmouth the email and webspace for students is already been outsourced for some of our 30K students.

The debate should be about the birth of CLE. What services? When? How? Privacy? Federated access, lifelong learning, ePortfolios etc

03:11PM Sat Sep 05, 2009

I would (and will ;) argue that even if a system is outsourced, if it remains in corporate 'control'/ownership and is presented as a unified service then it is only the infrastructure and delivery mechanism which has changed while the concept remains the same. In the context of the VLE, even if it were to evolve to use syndicated 3rd party tools, as long as those tools are seamlessly integrated within an institutional framework then it essentially remains a VLE.

I believe such a change would be an evolution of the infrastructure rather than marking a revolution of philosophy/pedagogy.

However, the cost of 'free services should not be ignored or underestimated, and I will also argue that it is IT proffesionals who are best placed to manage such a transition to outsourcing due to the legal, technical, usability and security issues -always in collaboration/consultation with academics and learning technologists of course :)

(hope I haven't made too many typos using the phone to reply- can't easily proof read it due to tiny text box)

06:43PM Sat Sep 05, 2009




I agree with you Nick (in principle). However, the case of Google offering email services along with Google Apps to our students (staff not included) is different from a simple outsourcing of institutionally controlled system to a cloud based service.

a) it creates a divide between staff and student's use of the outsourced system - perhaps not for long

b) its this very service (google apps/gmail/gtalk etc) that could be part of a student's PLE. The students will now have 2 accounts of every google service the university outsource. Its probably google's popularity that has played a role in such a decision along with the range of tools they offer that may be suitable for educational use.

The consultation process should include IT professional, academics, Learning technologists as well as students. I am always skeptical about "free" services (and insurance deals alike - thats another matter) but in this case the students seem really positive about google mail

10:23PM Sat Sep 05, 2009


The video of the VLE is Dead debate is now online.

http://elearningstuff.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/the-vle-is-dead-the-movie/

11:20AM Wed Sep 09, 2009



 

Who's Interested?